LSM's editor-in-chief writes on trusting the state in dangerous times ahead of elections

The editor-in-chief of Latvia's public broadcaster LSM has published a personal opinion piece framed as a guide for voters ahead of upcoming elections. Titled "Who to trust the state to in dangerous times?", the article invites readers to reflect on what qualities should matter when deciding who leads the country during an unsettled and uncertain era.

A personal reflection

The piece opens with the editor-in-chief recalling that a year and a half ago, as she weighed the arguments for and against running for the position of LSM's editor-in-chief, she had to answer a difficult question for herself: whether she would be able to lead the creation of public media content during wartime. This personal dilemma serves as the starting point for broader reflections on how to make decisions about leadership and trust under difficult, dangerous circumstances.

Connection to the elections

The article is positioned as the editor's personal guide for voters who will soon face a choice about who will lead the country in the coming years. The parallel between her own decision to take on responsibility in a complicated time and the choice now facing voters forms the core of the piece — in both cases, the issue is trust and responsibility in moments when the situation is neither simple nor safe.

The material was published in an LSM section that also reaches diaspora audiences, underlining that the question of state leadership and trust matters not only to those living in Latvia but also to compatriots abroad who follow events at home and the election process.

The piece is part of LSM's editorial effort ahead of the elections to offer audiences reflective content about responsible choices in a democratic process, rather than merely a roundup of facts or candidates.