Trade Union Confederation Voices Concern Over "United List" Zero-Deficit Budget Goal
LBAS chairman Egils Baldzēns has expressed concern over the political party "Apvienotais saraksts" (United List) aiming for a zero-deficit state budget, warning this could lead to cuts in state spending.
/nginx/o/2026/09/18/17924777t1h90cd.jpg)
The chairman of the Free Trade Union Confederation of Latvia (LBAS), Egils Baldzēns, has revealed that the organization has concerns regarding the goal set by the political party "Apvienotais saraksts" (United List) to achieve a state budget without a deficit. LBAS views this intention with caution, since achieving a zero-deficit budget typically implies cuts to state spending.
LBAS is one of the largest organizations defending workers' interests in Latvia, bringing together several trade unions and regularly taking part in discussions on state budget formation, tax policy, and funding for social areas. Baldzēns, who leads the confederation, represents the trade unions' position in negotiations with the government and political parties on economic and social policy matters.
What a zero-deficit budget means
"Apvienotais saraksts" is one of Latvia's political parties involved in discussions on state financial policy. Its stated goal — achieving a budget without a deficit — would mean that state revenues must cover all planned expenditures without relying on additional borrowing to fund the budget.
The concerns voiced by LBAS suggest that the trade unions expect that pursuing this fiscal goal could affect state budget items linked to social spending or public-sector wage policy. The LBAS chairman did not specify which particular areas might be affected.
The question of the state budget deficit and its reduction in Latvia typically becomes topical during the annual budget negotiations, when the government and political parties decide on the state's financial plan for the coming year. LBAS's position in this process has traditionally focused on defending the interests of workers and social protection, opposing excessive spending cuts in areas that affect residents' welfare.


