Head of Latvia's "Avots" children's care centre rejects Ombudsman's findings

Lilita Gasjaņeca, head of the "Avots" social support and care centre in Latvia's Augšdaugava municipality, has publicly rejected claims that the facility fails to properly feed children or receives inadequate support from the local government. Her comments followed a statement by Ombudsman Karina Palkova about serious violations of children's rights at a Latgale children's home housing about 20 children. The municipality's executive director confirmed the statement referred to "Avots."

Gasjaņeca said that after the Ombudsman's Office visit and the resulting publicity, the priority now is stabilizing the psychological state of both children and staff, since the situation caused confusion and tension with the surrounding community. She acknowledged that some children at the centre have behavioral or mental health issues, legal problems or addiction issues, but insisted children are fed, clothed, protected and listened to.

Regarding a photo published by the Ombudsman's Office showing an empty refrigerator, Gasjaņeca explained that, under Food and Veterinary Service rules, that particular fridge is meant only for storing leftovers from prepared meals. She said other storage is available where children themselves can keep and prepare snacks outside set mealtimes, mentioning favorites like pigs-in-blankets and pancakes. She also disputed claims of insufficient municipal cooperation, noting the local government helped provide children with glasses, medication and access to a family doctor.

Anna Jegorova, head of the Augšdaugava municipality's Social Service, said recommendations from the Children's Rights Protection agency are being implemented gradually but full compliance takes time, adding that some issues, including staff pay, must be addressed at the national rather than municipal level.

The Welfare Ministry, which inspected the centre last October and issued 19 recommendations after finding shortcomings in meal organization, safety and staff training, will now assess their implementation and decide whether a follow-up inspection is needed.